Speaking to City of San Bernardino About Tax Implications of Affortable Care Act/Covered CAlifornia

Yesterday, I attended an event by Covered California where some top officials flew in from Sacramento to have a discussion about Covered Califo10402937_1531182990480939_6076562254069810799_nrnia and current updates, concerns, tips for the last month of open enrollment.

It really bothered me when they mention there was over 700 registered agents in the area that was notified about this event, and only about 50 actually showed up. How are you supposed to give your clients the best possible help if you do not really understand what is happening.

I learned so much in this 3 hour session it should have been mandatory for all agents, there was a lot of valuable insights, tips, and recommendation we learned.

I  spent quite a bit of time speaking with the Director of Sales for Covered California, Kirk Whelan.

The highlight, was when I was honored to be asked to give my insights on the tax implications this year with IRS and Affordable Care Act.

I have a unique insight being a licensed tax preparer and Certified Covered California Insurance Agent.

After the event, I was invited by the City of San Bernardino Employment & Training Agency, to speak and educate up to 30 of their field staff and Certified Enrollment Counselors for Covered California, to discuss what to they can expect this tax season, to discuss the 1095 forms that consumer will start getting any day, and to discuss more about tax implications, tax penalties, and subsidies.

Looking forward to speaking at this event. If you have any questions about how ACA could affect your taxes gives us a call 909-570-1103

Hundreds of Thousands Face Health Law Subsidy Deadline

At Risk of Losing or Having to Pay Back Health Insurance Subsidies from Affordable Care Act
By STEPHANIE ARMOUR

Updated Sept. 29, 2014 9:26 p.m. ET

Americans in the hundreds of thousands may lose or have to pay back health insurance subsidies from Obamacare if they don’t meet a Tuesday deadline. WSJ’s Stephanie Armour reports. Photo: AP

WASHINGTON—Hundreds of thousands of Americans face a Tuesday deadline to verify their income and are at risk of losing or having to pay back their federal health-insurance subsidies under the Affordable Care Act.

The need for people to pay back the government could become a headache during next year’s tax season, when Americans are expected to pay back any subsidies they weren’t eligible for.

The Obama administration has told more than 300,000 individuals who obtained coverage through the federal HealthCare.gov site that they may lose some or all of the subsidies if they don’t provide additional income information that jibes with Internal Revenue Service data. That information includes tax returns, wages and tax statements, pay stubs and letters from employers.

Hundreds of thousands of people who obtained health coverage through state exchanges also have documentation issues and could potentially be getting subsidies they aren’t eligible for.

Enrollees whose income changed during the year but didn’t update their information could also owe the government if they received larger tax credits than they were entitled to. The owed amounts could total thousands of dollars, health policy experts say.

“Most people don’t know they even got advance tax credits,” said Mark Ciaramitaro, vice president, health-care services at tax preparer H&R Block Inc. “They are going to be surprised and need to know what just happened, and a lot of people will be frustrated.”

Individuals who signed up on HealthCare.gov for insurance and subsidies to lower their coverage costs were asked on their applications to estimate 2014 income and provide citizenship information. That information was checked against their 2012 tax returns. In some cases, the data didn’t match.

In addition to the roughly 300,000 people affected by the income verification, another 115,000 people may lose coverage on Tuesday because they didn’t provide requested documents verifying their citizenship or immigration status by a Sept. 5 federal deadline.

Collectively, more than 400,000 people who enrolled in health plans using HealthCare.gov have data-matching problems regarding their income or citizenship and immigration status.

“There are a lot of people counting on their refund to pay for Christmas charges, and instead they’ll be paying back their tax credit,” said Timothy Jost, a professor of health law at Washington and Lee University.

People accessing the Affordable Health Care Act website in December. Associated Press

White House officials pointed to the health law’s requirement that people who are proven to be ineligible for subsidies have to pay them back, but said additional guidance on how to do that will be provided later.

“Generally, individuals who enroll through the marketplace and receive advance premium tax credits will file federal income-tax returns and, at tax time, advance payments of the premium tax credit will be reconciled,” according to a statement from the Treasury Department.

Some experts say the repayment could be deducted from a tax refund, or consumers could have to write a check to the government if they don’t have a refund coming or it isn’t enough to cover what they owe.

Repayments may be limited to an amount between $300 and $2,500 for certain lower earners, according to the Internal Revenue Service. But higher earners may have to pay back the full amount.

Consumers who provide income data as requested by the federal government for Tuesday’s deadline may in some cases still wind up owing at tax time if they were previously getting incorrect subsidy amounts and the total is more than they are entitled to for the year, said policy experts.

The income inconsistencies are a politically thorny issue for the Obama administration. Republicans in Congress said during a June hearing that the system for verifying income and eligibility information through the federal marketplace was incomplete.

A report released in July by the Health and Human Services Department’s office of inspector general found that the federal marketplace sent notices to applicants requesting additional documents to resolve inconsistencies, but lacked the system capability to process them and resolve the mismatches.

Several state marketplaces reported federal data sources appeared at times not to be current or accurate. For example, one state marketplace said infants and young children included on applications were erroneously identified as incarcerated according to federal data, the OIG report said. The report looked at inconsistencies from October through December 2013.

But Aaron Albright, a spokesman for the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, said a Treasury inspector-general report also in July showed the IRS was nearly 100% accurate in providing information on income to health-insurance exchanges.

“We are committed to keeping coverage affordable for the millions of Americans who depend on it, and to doing so in an efficient, transparent way that protects taxpayers,” said Mr. Albright.

The government initially wasn’t able to accurately determine the income of about 1.2 million households out of the 5.4 million individuals who obtained coverage through the site. Federal officials say the majority of cases of inconsistencies have been resolved.

About 85% of the more than eight million people who enrolled in private coverage through the ACA obtained premium subsidies, according to HHS.

Tuesday’s deadlines just apply to applicants who purchased coverage on the federal marketplace. But some states that set up their own exchanges for purchasing insurance are also requesting information.

In California, notices have gone out to consumers reminding them to update income changes online so there are no discrepancies at tax time, said Angelina Valencia, spokeswoman for Covered California, the state exchange. Letters went out to more than 290,000 families where the state may be awaiting income documentation or information about whether the family had a decrease or increase in its size, which could affect what they owe when they do their taxes.

http://online.wsj.com/articles/hundreds-of-thousands-face-health-law-subsidy-deadline-1412006417#printMode

What the Indictment of ‘The Situation’ Tells Us About the Tax Code

Somehow, the most shocking thing about the indictment of Michael Sorrentino for tax fraud is not that the “Jersey Shore” star may have been less than punctilious about paying the taxman. After all, Mr. Sorrentino, known as “The Situation,” has never projected the levelheaded public image you’d associate with careful income tax compliance. (Here is a video in which he slams his head into a wall. Here is the 911 call from when he was in a brawl at a tanning salon).

The first surprising thing is that over a four-year period from the start of 2010, Mr. Sorrentino and his brother Marc are said, in the United States District Court indictment, to have earned $8.9 million. Not bad for a reality show personality whose main talent seems to be maintaining impressive abdominal muscles.

The second surprising thing is what the case shows about a basic fairness problem in the tax code. Mr. Sorrentino did plenty of things to avoid taxes that were perfectly legal, showing how those with the resources to hire accountants and lawyers can end up with lower tax bills than people with a regular job.

Mr. Sorrentino and his brother funneled their income from nightclub appearances and other sources (“a partnership interest in a vodka company, ownership of an online clothing business, publication of an autobiography and a comic book featuring defendant MICHAEL SORRENTINO as a superhero, and endorsements of products such as vitamins, DVDs, clothing lines, jewelry, tuxedos, and sunglasses”) into two corporate entities they controlled, M.P.S. Entertainment L.L.C. and Situation Nation Inc.

But that’s not what they got in trouble for. Many rich, and even not-so-rich, people funnel their income through a corporate entity. Essentially, from the tax code’s point of view, Mr. Sorrentino was the C.E.O. of an entertainment-and-endorsement company. It brought in money from his various ventures, paid expenses tied to fulfilling those ventures, and paid out the rest to him and his brother as income.

Both were pass-through entities under I.R.S. rules, meaning that they didn’t incur any tax obligations of their own, but rather passed their profits on to their owners, who then owed tax as personal income.

But it’s obvious where that creates opportunity for tax avoidance. If the corporate entities were to pay for things for Mr. Sorrentino that were not legitimate business-related expenditures, but rather just paying for Mr. Sorrentino’s living expenses, it would essentially allow him to avoid taxes on that portion of his income entirely.

And that is what the prosecutors allege happened. They say that he and his brother engaged in a conspiracy to pay for personal items, including luxury vehicles, designer clothing and “personal grooming expenses,” from the corporate entities, and to hide those purchases from their accountants. (The indictment does not specify whether that grooming includes tanning salons, but it seems a reasonable guess the answer is “yes.”)

What makes this a broader story about tax policy is that, while tax law aims to be black-and-white about what constitutes a deductible expense for people like the Sorrentinos who manage their affairs through corporate entities, in practice there are shades of gray.

Suppose you are a well-compensated strategy consultant and you run your income through an entity like the one the Sorrentinos used. You have a big dinner with a bunch of college buddies who all work in the corporate world. Good luck to the I.R.S. trying to prove that that was a personal meal rather than a good-faith effort to build relationships with potential clients.

Will you have to pay a healthcare tax penalty?

If you have health insurance, you don’t have to worry about paying a penalty. If you don’t have coverage for 3 or more months in 2014, you may be subject to paying a tax on your 2014 federal income tax return due April 2015.

Business & FinanceThe Tax Code, Translated Into Plain EnglishYour penalty amount is determined by the number of uninsured people in your household and your household’s taxable income.

The penalty is capped at an amount it would cost to purchase a certain level of insurance in your state’s health insurance marketplace. Penalty amounts will be prorated to only cover the number of months you and your family are uninsured.

Call us today we will be happy to help you with any questions you may have we can determine if there will be a tax penalty, call us direct at 909-570-1103.